Press Release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Nov. 27, 2006
Contact 518.462.2296
Policyholders will continue to pay as long as Health Insurance Mandate Review Commission is ignored
By Jeff Leland, chair
This spring the New York State Legislature ended years of drawn out
debate by agreeing to legislation that would expand the breadth of
mental health benefits required in health insurance policies. For small
and medium-sized businesses, the compromise was bittersweet. While
mandating minimum coverage for these services, the legislation for the
first time recognized the hardship of rising premiums on small firms
(less than 50 employees) by including a provision that will have the
state underwrite the entire cost of these mandated services. The
downside of the legislation is that despite wide disagreement by vying
interest groups on the premium impact of these additional services, it
will take several more years before we will know the true cost of this
mandate – because the Legislature has no formal process to evaluate
proposed health insurance mandates. This reality needs to change.
As business owners cite rising health care costs as their greatest
concern, state legislators are dragging their feet in finalizing a bill
that will provide relief from the burden of health insurance mandates.
While health insurance mandates are only one factor that influences
premium costs, they are an area that the Legislature can, and should
control.
Insurance mandate bills, like the mental health legislation expected to
pass the Assembly in December, are often counterproductive. Mandates
expand the scope of the basic health insurance policy, increasing costs
and causing the number of working, uninsured New Yorkers to escalate.
New York has the distinction of being a state with one of the highest
insurance premium rates in the nation and one of the most heavily
mandated states in the union – two very good reasons why lawmakers
should wait no longer to implement a Health Insurance Mandate Review
Commission.
The concept of a health insurance mandate review commission is not new.
According to The Council for Affordable Health Insurance, our state has
46 different health insurance mandates required in every policy sold in
the state and lawmakers consider nearly 100 more every year without the
benefit of an independent analysis prior to passage. Twenty-six other
states have already decided that any measure that may increase costs and
diminish coverage needs to be scrutinized before consideration,
including our closest neighbors, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Massachusetts
and New Jersey.
Even without the benefit of an independent analysis commission, the
numbers continue to speak for themselves. Studies exist which have
conclusively determined that there is a nexus between high premium costs
and the number and cost of state health insurance mandates, including
several commissioned here in the past six years. For instance, New
York’s chiropractic mandate law (1998) included a requirement that the
Department of Insurance study the impact of this new mandate. That
study, quietly released in 2000, determined that the cost of these
services accounted for as much as 2.6% of premium and concluded that
there were “no savings attributable to the passage of the mandate.”
Unfortunately, this study was done after the enactment of the
legislation, leaving little doubt that if such a study were available to
lawmakers prior to the passage of this mandate, the legislation would
have looked very different – or perhaps would not have been passed at
all. It has since been determined that the chiropractic mandate is one
of the most expensive mandated services in New York adding more than
$265 to the annual premium of every family policy in New York. In 2002,
while considering a mandate to cover computer aided detection (CAD)
mammograms, the legislature wisely passed a bill that called for the
Department of Insurance to formally study this issue. The report
concluded that a lack of data prevented a recommendation to mandate
computer aided detection screenings. Since that time new studies on CAD
have been released. If a commission was in place, they might be able
to effectively track scientific advances to determine if their findings
in 2002 are still appropriate today. Finally, in 2003, the Employer
Alliance issued an independent actuary report on the cost of New York’s
mandates. That study concluded that the current mandate burden cost
every fully insured policy 12.2% annually – nearly $1,300 on every
family policy.
If we are to keep premiums affordable, we must first ensure that
government takes no action that would increase premiums. A Health
Insurance Mandate Review Commission will provide the necessary data to
help lawmakers make sound decisions that will ensure their actions won’t
further erode our insurance coverage. As business owners, we cannot sit
back and wait for this to happen.
We have a head start. The governor and state legislators have already
completed the hardest task in implementing this commission when they
earmarked $300,000 for such an entity in the last state budget, pending
passage and approval of implementation of this (S.8481) legislation. The
Senate introduced legislation largely mirroring an existing Assembly
proposal that would create a commission charged with providing
independent reports that outline the cost and medical efficacy of health
insurance mandates prior to their passage. Now it seems that only the
dysfunction of Albany politics stands between the passage of this
necessary legislation and more affordable health insurance. The bill
remains largely ignored and the $300,000 agreed to by both houses in the
budget will be lost if the legislation is not passed by March 31.
Access to basic, affordable health insurance will continue to erode if
Legislators remain without the benefit of a Health Insurance Mandate
Review Commission. We cannot afford to let that happen.
The Employer Alliance for Affordable Health Care has started a petition
urging lawmakers to put the politics aside and enact a mandate
commission when they return for a special session on December 13. This
is our best shot at changing a dysfunctional process and giving New
Yorkers, the solid, fact-based decisions we deserve. It is not only good
business to get the facts before making a decision; it is basic common
sense. Add your voice today and tell lawmakers to put politics aside
and give New Yorkers the benefit of a Health Insurance Mandate Review
Commission. To sign this petition visit our website at
www.employeralliance.com and tell your elected officials that New York
needs and deserves, a Health Insurance Mandate Review Commission.
Editor’s Note: The author is chairman of the Employer Alliance for
Affordable Health Care, a coalition of more than 2,500 employers,
individuals and local governments from across New York State who are
committed to preserving quality affordable health care. He is also the
president of Leland Paper Co. in Glens Falls.
|